Last 30 days: 65,649,018 visitors

Poor Mother Pens Epic Letter To Paul Ryan: Stop Screwing The Poor To Help The Rich

Two years ago Tianna Gaines-Turner testified before Congress about families living in poverty, the struggles they face every day, and how the federal safety net can help them. She desperately wanted to be the human face that helped Speaker of the House Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) see reason as he held hearings on “the War on Poverty.” Now she has reached out, holding Ryan accountable for leaving her and millions of other hardworking impoverished Americans behind, demonstrating that the federal safety net does help fight poverty, and fighting against poor-shaming – unjustly blaming the poor and impoverished for their lack of wealth and opportunity.

Dear Speaker Ryan,

I read that you will roll out your new poverty task force’s proposal tomorrow, and I wonder if you remember me. I testified at one of the hearings you hosted on the War on Poverty two years ago. Of the 17 expert witnesses who participated in the series, I was the only one who actually lived in poverty.

I did my best to share my story and those of others in my community, and then I had the opportunity to meet you. As you reached to shake my hand, I said I wanted a hug. It was my way of trying to make our connection more personal—a reflection of my hope that we would begin to work together to make change around hunger and poverty.

As important as you said the issue was to you, I was sure that you would make a place in your work for me, my Witnesses to Hunger brothers and sisters, and many others who are living in poverty. Since 2008, we have used our photographs and testimonials to show the world what the experience of poverty is like and to advocate for serious change at the local, state, and national level.

So in the past two years, I reached out to your office numerous times. So did the people at Drexel University’s Center for Hunger-Free Communities, where Witnesses to Hunger is based. Your office never responded to us. Unfortunately, people such as me and my husband, and many others who are struggling continue to be shut out of your conversation in Washington.

As you may remember from my testimony, my husband and I work hard to provide for our family. I work at a community recreation center on afterschool programming for children. In recent years, my husband has worked the deli at a grocery store, overnight at a meat-packing plant, and as a security guard. He has endured two-hour commutes, worked night shifts, held multiple jobs at the same time—made the kinds of sacrifices a parent makes to try to lift up a family.

Yet despite our hard work, we’ve remained in poverty. Our three children suffer from epilepsy and asthma and take life-sustaining medication. We’ve rarely had benefits like paid leave that allow us to miss work without taking a hit to a paycheck. In 2008, our son was having seizures, and I had to leave my job to take care of him. Because of the lost income, we eventually lost our home and were homeless.

Should any person in America end up homeless for taking care of a sick child?

It’s clear as we look at how many people are struggling on low wages, forced to make impossible choices between basic necessities, that we still have plenty of work to do. It’s also clear that you could still learn a lot from me and many others who are experiencing poverty.

In your first speech as Speaker you called for combining many safety-net programs into a single block grant. But I know you realize that poverty would be twice as high without the safety net, with nearly 30 percent of Americans living below the poverty line. What would our nation look like with 30 percent poverty? We can thank the safety net for the fact that we don’t know the answer to that question.

You and I also both know that more than half of people in America will be poor or near poor for at least a year during their working years, so the safety net is there for all of us. But it needs to be strengthened. We are already cutting poverty in half with our current safety net. Now let’s set our sights on cutting poverty in half again. And let’s do it without messing up what is already working.

I hope your task force’s proposal builds on the things that we already know work—for example, we know the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reduces food insecurity and prevents hospitalizations, housing assistance helps young children stay healthy, and preschool helps kids reach their full potential. But I’m pretty sure we will see the same old dangerous ideas like block granting wrapped up in new pretty packaging.

Mr. Speaker, the cameras have long moved on since I had the opportunity to introduce myself to you. I continue to live in the struggle with my Witness sisters and brothers and millions of others in poverty, and we continue to be shut out of your conversation in Washington.

Meet with us. Let us show you what’s going on in our neighborhoods and our homes, and share our ideas about solutions and change.

Your friend,

Tianna Gaines-Turner
Philadelphia, PA

We fully support Mrs. Gaines-Turner’s push for an adequate safety net to protect the needs of vulnerable Americans. Paul Ryan, servant of the Koch Brothers and the ruling oligarchs, has spent his entire career pushing for the end of the federal safety net, scheming to outsource the funds to the states – where Republican-strangled statehouses will inevitably slash all the funding and redirect it towards tax cuts for multinational corporations, leaving inadequate services for millions of poor and impoverished citizens. You’ve never lived in poverty, Mr. Ryan, so stop telling the poor what they need and start listening to the people you pretend to represent.

Download our NEW Occupy Democrats app for your iPhone by clicking here or for your Android by clicking here.

Add your name to millions demanding that Congress take action on the President’s crimes. IMPEACH DONALD TRUMP!

Marisa Manfredo

Marisa completed her undergraduate degree in 2013 at the University of Wisconsin with a double major in creative writing and media studies. She is an advocate of progressive policies and focuses her interests on gender equality and preventing sexual and domestic violence.


What do you think?