Now Reading
Watch: 'Clinton Cash' Author Crashes and Burns When Pressed for Evidence of Clinton Crimes

Watch: 'Clinton Cash' Author Crashes and Burns When Pressed for Evidence of Clinton Crimes

Sponsored Links

Earlier today, “Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer was exposed as a conservative fraud when This Week’s George Stephanopoulos, pressed him to provide his evidence to support his allegations that the Clintons had committed a crime — and he was forced admit that he had not even a shred of evidence, only conspiracies. Over and over again, Stephanopoulos pressed him for a “smoking gun”, but the paid Republican shill was left rambling about unrelated things and trying to change the subject.

Here is the transcript(Video below):

STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have any evidence that a crime may have been committed?

SCHWEIZER: Well, I think it’s — if you look at a couple of recent examples. For example, Governor McConnell down in Virginia, or you look at Senator Menendez, in these cases, you didn’t have evidence of a quid pro quo. What you had was funds flowing to elected officials, some of them gifts, some of them campaign contributions and actions that were being taken by those public officials that seemed to benefit the contributors.

Certainly, I think it warrants investigation. What that investigation will reveal, we’ll see.

Sponsored Links

STEPHANOPOULOS: But a criminal investigation?

Sponsored Links

SCHWEIZER: Well, we’ll see. I mean that’s what the Governor McConnell has faced and that’s what Menendez has faced.

Sponsored Links

STEPHANOPOULOS: But the…

SCHWEIZER: And I think the evidence here is far more widespread in terms of repeated action than there were in those two instances.

STEPHANOPOULOS: As you know, the Clinton campaign says you haven’t produced a shred of evidence that there was any official action as secretary that — that supported the interests of donors.

SCHWEIZER: Well…

STEPHANOPOULOS: We’ve done investigative work here at ABC News, found no proof of any kind of direct action. And an independent government ethics expert, Bill Allison, of the Sunline Foundation (ph), wrote this. He said, “There’s no smoking gun, no evidence that she changed the policy based on donations to the foundation.”

No smoking gun.

Is there a smoking gun?

SCHWEIZER: Yes. The smoking gun is in the pattern of behavior. And here’s the analogy I would give you. It’s a little bit like insider trading. I wrote a book on Congressional insider trading a couple of years ago and talked with prosecutors

STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have any evidence that she actually intervened in this issue?

SCHWEIZER: No, we don’t have direct evidence. But it warrants further investigation because, again, George, this is part of the broader pattern. You either have to come to the conclusion that these are all coincidences or something else is afoot.

STEPHANOPOULOS: And that — that is that — the Clintons do say it’s a coincidence. As they say, you have produced no evidence. And I still haven’t heard any direct evidence and you just said you had no evidence that she intervened here.

 Video:

© 2019 Occupy Democrats. All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top